- About Hunger
- How to End Hunger
- Our Impact
- Get Involved
The United States has long been a global leader in responding to humanitarian emergencies and is the largest provider of lifesaving food aid. Since Food for Peace—the largest food aid program—began in the 1950s, approximately 3 billion people in 150 countries have benefited from American generosity and compassion. In fiscal year 2015, U.S. government food assistance reached 36 million people in 43 countries.
The world has changed dramatically since Food for Peace was first created. Food assistance is an integral part of the U.S. government’s efforts to end global hunger. But both the U.S. government and key stakeholders have also noted areas for improvement. There are many ways to strengthen and reform this valuable program to make it more efficient—which means that the same appropriated funding can reach more hungry people overseas, especially malnourished women and children.
The most important “window of opportunity” for human nutrition is the 1,000 days between a woman’s pregnancy and her child’s second birthday. Malnutrition during this time causes lifelong, often irreversible damage to children’s health and development, leading to educational, social, and economic consequences. Countries with high child malnutrition rates can lose as much as 12 percent of their annual gross domestic product (GDP) as a result.
More people are in need of assistance than ever, particularly because of the lasting effects of drought and conflicts in regions, such as East Africa. In today’s budgetary climate the U.S. government needs to be as flexible as it can while remaining a responsible steward of appropriated funds. Economic experts consider food assistance programs that prevent and treat malnutrition to be among the best investments in development assistance.
The Food for Peace Act authorizes food aid as both disaster response and longer-term development assistance. In a humanitarian response, improved nutrition in food assistance products that are either sent from the United States or purchased locally can save more lives and prevent more cases of severe malnutrition. Most of those who benefit will be young children. To do this in the most effective and efficient way, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and its partners need additional flexibility to provide recipients with the most appropriate food assistance.
Analysts anticipate that the 2018 farm bill and other upcoming legislation will include food aid reform proposals. To be most effective in helping people who are hungry or malnourished, the final legislation must include the following provisions: Authorize local and regional procurement; improve food aid quality and measure nutrition outcomes; allow flexibility in resource allocation; end the monetization requirement; allocate resources according to global needs; and reduce the impact of argo prefernce on food aid programs.
These fact sheets provide a snapshot of hunger and poverty in the United States and in each state plus Washington, D.C.
Better nutrition is a necessary component of a country’s capacity to achieve development goals such as economic growth and improved public health.
Worldwide, maternal and child malnutrition causes millions of deaths each year. In some countries, it holds entire generations back from reaching their economic potential.
Dear Members of Congress,
As the president and Congress are preparing their plans for this year, almost 100 church leaders—from all the families of U.S. Christianity—are...
This devotional guide invites deepened relationship with and among Pan-African people and elected leaders in the mission to end hunger and poverty.
Thank you for inviting me to preach here at Duke University Chapel. And I especially want to thank the Bread for the World members who have come this morning.
Bruce Puckett urged...
Bread for the World and its partners are asking Congress to provide $250 million for global nutrition in the fiscal year 2020 budget.
In 2017, 11.8 percent of households in the U.S.—40 million people—were food-insecure, meaning that they were unsure at some point during the year about how they would provide for their next meal.