- About Hunger
- How to End Hunger
- Our Impact
- Get Involved
By Cynthia Woodside, Bread for the World Institute
In testimony before the House Agriculture Committee on November 18, the co-chairs of the National Commission on Hunger, Mariana Chilton of the Dornsife School of Public Health at Drexel University and Robert Doar of the American Enterprise Institute, gave a preview of the commission’s report, which will be released in the coming weeks.
The National Commission on Hunger is new, created by Congress in 2014. It’s a 10-member bipartisan group of experts, appointed by the majority and minority leaders in both chambers of Congress. Its mandate is to recommend policies to Congress and the Secretary of Agriculture to “more effectively use existing programs and funds of the Department of Agriculture [USDA] to combat domestic hunger and food insecurity; and to develop innovative recommendations to encourage public-private partnerships, faith-based sector engagement, and community initiatives to reduce the need for government assistance programs, while protecting the safety net for the most vulnerable members of society.”
The commission’s work can be a critical piece in addressing Goal 2 of the Sustainable Development Goals – to end hunger and improve nutrition in the United States and around the world by 2030. The commission’s recommendations can jumpstart a needed national conversation about what the administration, Congress, and civil society can do in the short term and the longer term to address hunger.
At the hearing, the co-chairs emphasized that the report’s specific recommendations, not yet finalized, are to be agreed upon unanimously. Such a consensus will likely leave both sides of the political spectrum unsatisfied, but hopefully will lay the groundwork for meaningful steps to be taken against hunger—even in an election year.
In addition to recommendations for solutions and improvements, the co-chairs indicated that the report will define hunger and its consequences, name the root causes of hunger, and identify populations that warrant special concern. The commission will use the terms “food insecurity” and “very low food security,” which have precise definitions validated by extensive research at USDA. The commission’s plan is to identify ways to improve programs for households with very low food security, defined as households where at least one person faces disrupted eating patterns and reduced food intake because of lack of money for food. Bread for the World considers very low food security to be hunger. The most recent data, for 2014, show 6.9 million such households in our country.
The co-chairs said that the commission’s research has determined that federal nutrition assistance programs such as SNAP, WIC, and school meals are effective tools in responding to hunger, but that they are insufficient to end hunger. According to their testimony, the safety net programs provide a strong foundation, but without a focus on the root causes, hunger will continue.
It will come as no surprise to Bread members that the commission’s research found that people at greater risk of having very low food security include groups such as those who are unemployed or under-employed, those without a high school diploma, and those in households headed by a single parent. Other groups at greater risk include African-Americans, Hispanics, Native Americans, seniors, people with disabilities, veterans, ex-offenders/returning citizens, and immigrants. Bread for the World would add “children” to the list of those warranting special concern, since households with children are far more likely to be food insecure than those without children. Sadly, one of the groups most at risk of food insecurity in the United States is children younger than 3. And it has become increasingly clear how critical it is for very young children to get good nutrition. Hunger in early childhood can carry lifelong consequences for children’s health, education, and employment.
The co-chairs noted five broad themes in their testimony about the upcoming report:
It is heartening that the National Commission on Hunger’s testimony affirmed that reducing hunger is “a question of values – no one in a country as rich as ours should go hungry” and “should be an urgent priority of Congress.” We also are encouraged that the testimony supports Bread’s longtime emphasis on the need to establish a comprehensive, interconnected set of strategies that target the root causes of hunger. We look forward to reviewing the commission’s final recommendations.
Cynthia Woodside is senior domestic policy analyst at Bread for the World Institute.
Hunger in early childhood can carry lifelong consequences for children’s health, education, and employment.
Afghanistan would be considered likely to have high rates of hunger because at least two of the major causes of global hunger affect it—armed conflict and fragile governmental institutions.
Malnutrition is responsible for nearly half of all preventable deaths among children under 5. Every year, the world loses hundreds of thousands of young children and babies to hunger-related causes.
Bread for the World is calling on the Biden-Harris administration and Congress to build a better 1,000-Days infrastructure in the United States.
“As you therefore have received Christ Jesus the Lord, continue to live your lives in him, rooted and built up in him and established in faith.” These words from Colossians 2:6 remind us of the faith that is active in love for our neighbors.
The Bible on...
The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is designed to respond to changes in need, making it well suited to respond to crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic.
Bread for the World and its partners are asking Congress to provide $200 million for global nutrition.
In 2017, 11.8 percent of households in the U.S.—40 million people—were food-insecure, meaning that they were unsure at some point during the year about how they would provide for their next meal.